Advertisement
Exclusive: NRA Gets “Woke” on “Racism” and Ignores Urgent Gun Rights Issues
August 4, 2020 (3mo ago)
11

These days, conservatives have grown quite used to their “leaders” caving and kneeling for the left, and it appears that lately, the National Rifle Association is no exception. Revolver News regrets to inform you, dear reader, that the National Rifle Association has seemingly gone “woke” in a bid to appease the left.

Fittingly for 2020 America, the story began with a case of Boomer incompetence. A retired judge, Richard Neville, was serving as an arbitrator in a case between the NRA and an unidentified other party. Like countless Americans, Neville has a group of friends he shares articles and news stories with. On June 20th, Neville shared an article, supposedly from the Baltimore Sun and entitled “The Black Dilemma.”

It turns out that this article was not published in the Baltimore Sun, and was actually published on the controversial website American Renaissance in 2014.

While sharing the article with his friends, he mistakenly CC’d Svetlana Eisenberg, an attorney representing the NRA.

And there the story could have ended, with Eisenberg deleting the wayward email and everyone moving on with their lives. Instead, she replied with an affected scolding worthy of David French.

“I have no idea why Judge Neville included me in this highly offensive and disturbing email chain,” Eisenberg said. “I am obliged to state that they reflect views which are abhorrent, indecent and at odds with core values of mine and my firm. It is shocking that anyone—let alone a former member of the judiciary—would disseminate this material or invite others to consider it as containing ‘facts’ warranting consideration and debate.”

Once again, the story could have ended there. Instead, the NRA seems to have naively concluded that it can score a political victory by playing along with the left’s woke politics. This week, the group filed a lawsuit against its arbitration service, JAMS, and against its opposing legal counsel in the arbitration, Winston and Strawn, a top Chicago law firm. The lawsuit leverages accusations of “racism” in an attempt to extract concessions from Winston and JAMS.

In the lawsuit, the NRA resorts to rhetoric befitting a press release by the Southern Poverty Law Center (in fact, the suit cites the SPLC directly). For example:

“In response, several members of Neville’s email group rushed to the defense of Neville—and white supremacy.” (Nobody in Neville’s group advocated white supremacy. In fact, the messages mostly seem to defend open debate, a concept increasingly stigmatized in today’s media environment — and, apparently, at the NRA)

“The NRA does not believe the facts or truth of the Arbitration, or any case should be adjudicated by an arbitrator who . . . questions Black Americans’ coexistence with others in the United States.”

Back in 2017, the Wall Street Journal highlighted the “insidious influence” of the SPLC, and concluded that their work “arguably contributes to the climate of hate it abhors.” In an explosive twitter thread, U.S. Senator Kelly Loeffler recently concluded that they have “no credibility.”

Why on earth would the NRA would choose to rely on such a failed and discredited left-wing organization?

At one point, the NRA directly copies from the toxic “cancel culture” of the left. The lawsuit states that “private citizens are free to entertain whatever distasteful views they wish,” then immediately tars an opposing lawyer simply for being a recipient of Neville’s email.

The lawyer himself didn’t say anything at all, but for the NRA, guilt by association is enough. He is a member of a “white supremacist email group,” and must be destroyed.

For good measure, even though some material is redacted, the lawsuit includes the un-redacted names of every other recipient of Neville’s email, even those who have nothing to do with the NRA’s lawsuit, exposing them to harassment and professional ruin as well.

It is utterly unclear what the NRA hopes to gain from this stunt, but we can surmise that it seems to be an effort to win plaudits from the left. If that’s the case, it won’t work.

The left has already made it clear what they think of the NRA, and of gun rights: They want the NRA gone, and guns confiscated from their law-abiding owners. An over-the-top endorsement of cancel culture and the left’s racial politics will do nothing to change that.

The NRA is one of the most important political organizations in America. It has become a powerful and trusted institution on the right precisely because, for years, it refused to fall into the same traps other “conservative” organizations did. The group stayed absolutely committed to its core agenda, protecting Americans’ gun rights, and didn’t allow its enemies to dictate what it was allowed to believe, and what it was allowed to think.

Even after incidents like the Sandy Hook shooting, the NRA didn’t let itself get bullied into fake concessions like an “assault weapons ban” that were clearly just stepping stones to large-scale gun bans. And so, the NRA thrived, and when the left tried to destroy them with underhanded tactics like labeling them a “terrorist” group, they failed.

The NRA has long been a litigious organization, but its past efforts have been worthwhile attacks on financial censorship or draconian lockdowns (and of course, the group played a central role in 2008’s District of Columbia v. Heller Supreme Court decision expanding gun rights).

Sadly, the NRA appears to be making the same mistakes that have turned countless other “conservative” groups into the left’s designated losers. In the past month, they have completely failed to stand up for Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the St. Louis homeowners who brandished firearms to protect themselves and their home from a dangerous mob.

Instead, the NRA is only alienating its core base of normal, middle-class Americans. Why is a gun rights organization running around calling people racists for sharing an article, or simply for being on an email list? Does the NRA still care about gun rights, and protecting ordinary Americans from tyranny? Or, like so many other “conservative” groups, do they care most about having the left like them?

The NRA had better begin purging “woke” scolds from their organization, and get back to the business of defending America. Our freedom to bear arms depends on it.

Public Service Announcement:

Revolver News is a brand new website dedicated to news aggregation and analysis. While we greatly respect and admire Matt Drudge, the Drudge Report no longer has its finger on the pulse of America. We aim to fill that void, and much more. We are dedicated to providing Americans of all backgrounds and political persuasions with timely, common-sense, accurate and compelling information. Be sure to check out our news feed.

11 responses to “Exclusive: NRA Gets “Woke” on “Racism” and Ignores Urgent Gun Rights Issues”

  1. All of this insidious wokeness spreading throughout society reminds me of the movie, “Invasion of the Body Snatchers”. The seed pods from outer space are opening, the spores are spreading and at least a portion of humanity is turning alien. Life imitates art and the real life nightmare grows like an alien virus infecting some and sparing others.
    The ones who have surrendered to the alien virus go on bended knee and give their souls over to the devil do so because they are spineless cowards and have no code. Those of us who refuse to surrender to this Marxist/Communist scourge would rather die on our feet than live on our knees.

  2. Sending an AmRen article to a jew–never a good idea. I did notice that, as always, no one explained how the article (“Ten Percent Is Not Enough”) is wrong. Seems to me that every word is spot-on.

    • The American Renaissance isn’t antisemitic. Some of its followers are but most AmRen readers aren’t. Jared Taylor supports Israel and isn’t even close to being a white supremacist.

  3. I always told people NOT to join the NRA, the one to join is NAGR. NRA is for gun registration which will be used against you when the government seizes guns, like in California. They pull up to your house and say, ‘Give us your guns, we know you have them because you registered them.’ I’m a member of National Association for Gun Rights, NAGR (Just think of your wife, a Nagger).

    • I’ve been very disappointed with the NRA. I refused to join them a few years back for going limp on some First Amendment issues. I’m back with them now, but nervous.

  4. The article claims the NRA cites the SPLC directly, but cites no evidence or quotes. The article claims the NRA “copies” from the “cancel culture,” but cites no examples or quotes, and instead simply makes assertions. The article does not even discuss or explain what the arbitration suit is about. The article may well be accurate; but it is not convincing.

    • They linked to the NRA’s lawsuit which you can read for yourself. On page 10 footnote 16, the NRA cites the SPLC in order to allege that American Renaissance is a white nationalist hate group.

  5. In time, all organizations that aren’t explicitly right-wing, go left-wing. It’s very important to take into account WHO you staff your institutions with. Identity is a big determinant as to which politics one will eventually see with. The left recognizes this. It’s time for the right to recognize this as well.
    Staff your institutions with people who are friendly to your cause, or watch them slowly mutate into something you don’t recognize.

  6. What a bunch of disgusting racists here. Blech. Inbred trailer park trash, no doubt. White people had control of the country for over two hundreds years and drove it into a ditch because of their bigotry, superstition, and an unearned sense of superiority, all of which is on display here.

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies.

Okay