Internet Sleuths Claim Two Newly Uncovered Videos From Jan 6th Reveal Who Shot Ashli Babbitt
May 7, 2021 (7mo ago)

Experience Revolver without ads

Hide ads now

Support Revolver By Going AD-FREE

CHECK OUT THE NEWS FEED — FOLLOW US ON GAB — CHECK OUT THE MERCH STORE

One of the reasons that conspiracy theories and internet sleuthing are on the rise is because there’s a critical breakdown in trust between the public and the government.

That breakdown can be organic and it can also be manufactured. Either way, it breeds distrust, suspicion, and drives a frenetic need in the public to uncover the “truth.”

We saw that happen in 2016 with the left’s obsession over all things “Russia.”  Those conspiracy theories ran amok for four-plus years, and were fueled by political leaders and the mainstream media which convinced a large swath of the public that Vladimir Putin was secretly running the White House.

The left sincerely thought they were completely justified in what they believed — they felt distrust, disenfranchised, and out of control.

In the end their conspiracy was proven false, but to this day, many on the left are still wearing their tinfoil hats and pushing the Russia nonsense.

In all fairness, the right also engages in conspiracy theories as well — again, it’s human nature to distrust the “powers that be.”

And one incident that has sparked a lot of different theories and internet sleuthing is the melee that unfolded at the Capitol on January 6th.

That event has been marred by fake news, politicization, and has also been used by politicians as a weapon of mass control and destruction- and no, that’s not a “conspiracy theory,” it’s fact.

Early reports from “trusted” mainstream news sources claimed that Trump supporters beat a cop to death with a fire extinguisher.

That never happened, but if you spend any time on social media, you will see many people still pushing that lie. The same goes for calling it an “armed insurrection.” Trump supporters were not armed. The only people who had guns were Capitol Police. And to this date not a single person has been charged with the crime of insurrection.

However, those lies were the green light for Joe Biden to turn DC into a real-life version of the Hunger Games and unleash the power of his DOJ on “political dissenters.”

When in realty, the biggest tragedy that unfolded on January 6th was the shooting death of unarmed Trump Supporter Ashli Babbitt.

Many of the conspiracy theories surrounding January 6th revolve around her death — mainly because the government will not reveal the name of the man who shot her. By law, they don’t have to tell us who he is. Basically, “what happens on Capitol Hill, stays on Capitol Hill.”

They also decided not to charge him with her death, even though the Medical Examiner listed her cause of death as “homicide.”

This is a hard pill for the public to swallow, especially since we’ve seen working-class cops all across America get called out publicly when there’s a shooting of a black man, and then watched in horror as BLM burned our cities and businesses to the ground and threatened the officer’s life.

So, that’s why many people online have dedicated a lot of time to trying to figure out who shot Ashli Babbitt. They feel they have no other choice and that the government has let them down.

But it’s not just “citizen sleuths” who want to get to the bottom of this. Award-winning journalists also want answers.

From Bizpacreview:

Journalist Sharyl Attkisson is still trying to get an answer regarding who shot and killed protester Ashli Babbitt during the Capitol riot on January 6 and why the officer’s name is being kept secret.

The Capitol Police officer who killed Babbitt has not faced any charges for doing so. Rumors are still swirling that the officer is in hiding because he fears for his life but there has been no credible evidence to support those claims or actions.

One debunked theory that got a lot of attention online was that the man who shot Ashli was a Capitol Hill police officer by the name of David Bailey. But the family of Ashli Babbitt issued a statement that made it clear that Mr. Bailey was not the shooter.

That didn’t stop the sleuths and conspiracy theorists from more digging, and now, after uncovering two January 6th videos, these “citizen investigators”  believe they’ve identified the officer who shot Ashli Babbitt.

The first video they uncovered is just 19-seconds long, and all you see is the hand of the shooter holding and firing the gun. However, the one thing the sleuths zeroed in on was the “French cuff” on the the shooters sleeve. They claim that’s not in-line with a standard Cap police officer uniform. They also took note of the bracelet the man is wearing.

Watch:

Using that “cuff” and bracelet as their new hot pieces of evidence, the sleuths searched through piles of footage until they found what they believe is footage of the man who matches that cuff and bracelet.

See for yourself:

So, while this is the latest theory, it sadly will likely not be the last, because we have a government who refuses to be transparent with the people who pay their salaries.

I’ve heard people say that Chuck Schumer was the man who killed Ashli Babbitt, or that Nancy Pelosi ordered the killing. There are a lot of wild-eyed theories floating around out there, and that’s a shame, because the American people deserve better, and so does Ashli’s family.

Her family and her supporters deserve the truth and an explanation for why her life was snuffed out. That’s what this really should be all about. Eliminating the “sleuths” by sharing the truth.

And until that happens, people will continue “investigating” this for themselves and good or bad, they’ll keep sharing what they find online, and the cycle of distrust between public and government will continue to grow.

Support Revolver By Going AD-FREE

CHECK OUT THE NEWS FEED — FOLLOW US ON GAB — CHECK OUT THE MERCH STORE

SUPPORT REVOLVER.NEWS WITH A DONATION

Please contribute to our war chest. Donations help us grow, stay online, and fight.

“Our people have all left Drudge ... They like REVOLVER and others!”
President Donald J. Trump
“...many of Drudge's long-time readers have fled to Revolver News...”
Tucker Carlson, FOX News

Want to remove the ads on Revolver? Subscribe!

Support our war chest with a monthly subscription and enjoy a faster, minimal Revolver.News reading experience.

Subscribe monthly

$5.00 / monthHide ads for $5/month

Subscribe for a year

$49.00 / yearHide ads for $49/year

$11 OFF — Best value
Subscribe
Notify of
154 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Guest
7 months ago

I bet that person is a Democrat!

Guest
7 months ago

Doesn't matter if he/she is or not, the family needs answers.

Guest
7 months ago

Laying 1/99 are you?

motherofmax
6 months ago

Maybe. But they are the ones who planned this staged event with terrible crisis actors, including Babbitt, and fake blood.

Guest
6 months ago

According to his fb page (which was available on 8 Jan) he is a BLM supporter and a Brazilian immigrant. Honestly, this was already found on 8 Jan. Someone scrubbed it but…it's resurfacing. I'm sure the fb page is gone too.

Guest
7 months ago

This looks unjustified to me. He was waiting for an opportunity to take a shot.

Guest
7 months ago

OK, so who was it then?

Guest
7 months ago

The murderer doesn't fit the narrative.

Guest
6 months ago

Lt. Michael Byrd

Guest
6 months ago

US Capitol Special Agent David Bailey Who Murdered Ashli Babbitt is a Brazilian Immigrant and Black Lives Matter Militant — HE REPEATEDLY THREATENED TO KILL TRUMP SUPPORTERS ON FACEBOOK FOR MONTHS! – Nwo Report

Guest
5 months ago

Lt Michael Leroy Byrd of the Capital Police.

motherofmax
7 months ago

100% staged. Babbitt is a crisis actor along with the rest of them.

Guest
7 months ago

Explain how her murder is advancing "their" agenda.

Guest
7 months ago

cultivate hate, race war, also signal that MAGA has no power/control, demoralize, I could go on and on

bfarrisj
7 months ago

What is clear is that he is black. That wouldn't fit the narrative very well would it?

Guest
7 months ago

Probably why they will not say who did it? IDK.

bfarrisj
7 months ago

What is clear is that he is black. "Black cop kills white veteran" wouldn't fit the narrative very well, now would it?

Guest
7 months ago

Hard to tell from the small screen but is the shooter black?

PATRIOT_1776_t
7 months ago

he looks black well well that explains why they don't want us to know this george floyd had to have his day injustice and this would throw a black KILLER IN THE MIX that ONLY WHITE COPS KILL BLACKS and black cops don't KILL WHITES

Guest
7 months ago

Does that pistol match what's issued to Capitol police?

Guest
7 months ago

David Bailey is the shooters name

Guest
6 months ago

The family says not David Bailey.

Guest
7 months ago

I can't even bear to watch anymore. Sorry. That poor woman. She wasn't armed, she wasn't going to harm anyone. She just wanted to protest an election we all know was stolen. It was partly her House, she paid taxes, she served her country in Iraq and Afghanistan, there was no justifying shooting her. That order to do so came from the very top, to frighten Trump supporters. She gave her life for her country. And the man is going to get away with murder.

motherofmax
7 months ago

You might want to read the next comment and watch the video.

Guest
7 months ago

Nazichop Promoting hate, violence and war again.

Guest
7 months ago

"Ashli Babbitt" was a crisis actor. America has been defeated in Iraq and Afghanistan. Stop pushing lies Troll.

ikeepsitreal77
7 months ago

The comment of an insane person.

Guest
6 months ago

Evidence?

Guest
6 months ago

Did she get paid, for acting to be shot to death, beforehand or after, when she was dead ?
There must have been an actor's contract, please submit a link to the image of this contract.

Guest
6 months ago

One day your family will rejoice when you die.

Guest
6 months ago

Ashli Babbitt was a crisis actor, you people are sooooo gullible.

Guest
7 months ago

The article is well thought out and comes to a reasonable conclusion. The author bends over backwards to equate the falsehoods of the left with the "theories" of the conservatives, and therein lies the problem. Conservative Patriots are by and large fair people that want to be "reasonable". The left however is often tyrannical and regards the objective truth as either non-existent or something to be exploited. The left knowingly and deliberately spreads lies. They see the Patriot "reasonableness" as weakness to be exploited. If nothing else the left knows their deception creates dissonance; and they brainwash mallable minds. More often than not, the Truth does not serve them. It has been weaponized, quite literally. The Patriots more often than not sincerely seek objective truth. Equating the two camps, as the author has done: "to be fair" plays into the hands of the marxists. Remember Marxism is predicated on deception and muderous oppression. Should one literally give weight to the overtures to the disciples of Hitler. Stalin, and dare I say, satan himself in tje interest of beong "fair"? Of course not…. One must think critically: if one camp continually cries "wolf" and there is rarely a real wolf. And the other side cries "wolf" and is near always proven out, and concedes and explains erroneous proclamations, which side should the wise believe? The answer is obvious….

Lemuel Pitkin
7 months ago

Good analysis. The paradox of tolerance comes into play here. You cannot tolerate the intolerant for you will lose your society when you do so.
The back stop for our founding fathers and their liberalism is best summed up by Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs which I feel lays down the relative primacy of safety and security over that of higher moral principles.
Simply put, our society has a right to survive and to do that which it must do to ensure that survival. Putting down Marxist or Islamists insurgencies and treasonous behaviors is made acceptable since the first order of business is this right to survive. Since our society wishes to bestow all men with Liberty and Freedom, the necessity of survival becomes justified by this higher order of purpose.

JoeJones
7 months ago

the name was put out there by Gateway Pundit a month ago…then retracted…..Anyone remember the name?

Guest
6 months ago

Micheal LeRon Byrd

Guest
7 months ago

"their conspiracy was proven false" –No, a conspiracy either occurred, or it didn't occur, but a conspiracy cannot be proven false. A theory can, though.

Guest
7 months ago

I think Nancy Pelosi gave the order to shoot and that's what's really at stake here. Protecting her. The actual shooter is secondary.

Guest
7 months ago

And Schumer.

Guest
5 months ago

He's so evil. He and Nancy. Every time I look at them I shudder. I can see Satan in their faces!

Guest
4 months ago

Wow. I can too!

Guest
6 months ago

Green lighted ( and orchestrated ) no doubt, weeks in advance. Agreed, trigger man inconsequential. Even IF he were prosecuted, as long as he pleads the 5th and charges don't flow uphill, we're still in the dark as to the grander design.

Willy B.
6 months ago

..Then jail her too… vile, nasty POD

Guest
6 months ago

Still waiting to hear the murderer's name. Pelosi and Schumer are obviously protecting him to save their own political skins.

Guest
6 months ago

I feel so sorry for her husband. The grief he must feel.

Guest
6 months ago

I think NaziChop murdered her.

Guest
5 months ago

Wouldn't put it past him? He's a very evil soul. Lies constantly.

Guest
6 months ago

Still no answers from the left in control.

Dave Grenier
7 months ago

I'm all for the prosecution of the agent or officer who shot Babbitt, but Revolver needs to understand the terminology it uses to avoid giving readers the wrong impression.

The word "homicide" on a death certificate indicates only that another human was involved in precipitating the death. It does not indicate the commission of a crime and Revolver should not imply that it does so. Its use on Babbitt's death certificate means nothing more than "killed by the action of another person." It does not mean "murder." Even self-defense killings are "homicides." Homicides are investigated to determine if they are crimes or if circumstances justified the killing or indicate the death was accidental. (Police have "homicide" divisions or sections to investigate deaths that involve another person. Their investigations are meant to reveal the circumstances surrounding the death and to determine if laws were broken. Even a "good shoot" remains a homicide after investigation and a determination of "justified.")

Guest
7 months ago

If no crime was committed why don't the feds ID the shooter?

Guest
7 months ago

What I have read and reported here and other outlets is they don't have to being the officer in question is a capitol police officer, special rules apply, the don't ask cause we won't tell policy.
Have not heard if a D. C. officer would benefit the same as the murderer though.
So being Capitol Police Officer and Black, talk about the daily double of a license to kill!
This guy "Stalked" and then Killed, video proves it.
The murderer in no way shape or form should be allowed to own a firearm let alone be entrusted to use one as an officer of the law. He is psychotic and probably a serial killer, his actions showed "Lust" for the act of murder.

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies.

Okay