Revolver Investigation, Part Two: Exposing the Media’s Plot to Hide Record Vaccine Deaths and Deceive Americans
June 2, 2021 (5mo ago)

Experience Revolver without ads

Hide ads now

Support Revolver By Going AD-FREE

CHECK OUT THE NEWS FEED — FOLLOW US ON GAB — CHECK OUT THE MERCH STORE

Reader’s Note: This is Part Two of a three part series. If you haven’t done so, please read Part One here. Read the final installment, Part Three, here.

Guest Post by Michael Thau, Ph.D.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a database managed by the CDC that collects reports of health problems experienced after taking a vaccine.

It aims to identify potential side effects that premarket safety testing may have missed. According to the CDC, VAERS is supposed to be “the nation’s frontline system for monitoring vaccine safety.” This is especially critical for the COVID-19 shots, since they were the first to go on the market without the long-term safety testing required for FDA approval. See Part 1 of this series.

You would hope that if a new vaccine wound up getting more death reports in five months than all the others combined over the entire previous 28 years, that might warrant some attention.

Think again.

An army of journalists and self-proclaimed fact-checkers stand ready to besiege anyone who dares to report on this astonishing data. Not only is there nothing to see, suggesting otherwise makes you a conspiracy theorist or a far-right extremist, according to our betters in the fake news media.

But empty vilification hasn’t been the only scurrilous technique employed by the powers-that-be.

Real Number of Deaths Unknown

VAERS relies entirely on voluntary reporting, but hardly anyone knows it exists, so it is bound to capture a mere fraction of actual side effects.

When Tucker Carlson drew attention to the reports piling up in VAERS, the Washington Post, Forbes, and most other disparagers failed to mention his explicit reference to a group of Harvard researchers who conclusively demonstrated that the VAERS detection rate is abysmal. Again, see Part 1 of this series.

Carlson’s conclusion that nobody actually knows the true number of people who’ve died after Covid vaccination was flippantly assailed by the odious propagandists at Media Matters. They made an irrelevant rebuttal which involved a blatant lie:

But, that data does exist. While the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention oversees VAERS, it also runs the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). [Media Matters]

But of course the data exists somewhere. Carlson’s point was that no one has collected and analyzed it to determine the true number of post-COVID-vaccine deaths.

Moreover, it doesn’t exist at VSD, which contains information from only nine healthcare facilities scattered across the US — not the entire country. And its purpose is to “conduct studies based on questions or concerns already raised by the medical literature and reports to VAERS,” not to be a frontline detection system in its own right.

So, someone would have to actively sift through the VSD data to know the number of post-vaccination deaths experienced at just those nine facilities. And there’s zero indication anyone has done even that.

Not only does nobody know the real number of Americans who’ve died after taking a Covid vaccine, no one in charge seems to even care.

The media outlets providing our vaccine overlords cover have also kept despicably silent about how few reports were coming in prior to the COVID-19 vaccines. The media excoriated people for mentioning a “mere” 4,000 death reports in five months, without mentioning that before the Covid vaccines came along, VAERS had only exceeded 200 death reports in an entire year once in its three-decade history.

Again, the VAERS tally shows 1,000 more deaths than the number of people who perished on 9/11.

But the point is that, from beginning to end, Carlson made it clear his main point wasn’t even about VAERS.

His subject was the bullying and censorship that’s getting heaped on “anyone who dares to question vaccines,” and he spent more time chronicling disturbing cases than he did on VAERS.

Nothing could have proven Carlson’s point better than the despicably dishonest responses twisting both his words and the facts.

As Carlson noted, the data piling up in VAERS doesn’t necessarily tell us anything about the Covid vaccines. Maybe, the relentless publicity has massively increased the likelihood that potential side effects will get reported.

But without looking into the matter, it’s just as likely that reporting has been suppressed by the vilification of anyone who so much as raises the possibility that getting jabbed is anything less than perfectly harmless.

Who knows? The fact is we won’t until someone looks.

Whatever the case may be, the volume of death reports flooding VAERS is extraordinary. The effort to destroy anyone saying otherwise makes a full investigation much less likely and could portend something very dark indeed.

We’ve barely plumbed the depths of the VAERS cover-up.

Preposterous lies

The narrative gatekeepers are also hiding a significant source of undercounting that’s likely occurring precisely because of the unprecedented volume of reports coming in.

Moreover, they’ve frequently done so by saying something both false and preposterous.

Jack Brewster of Forbes, for example, both revealed and justified the utter contempt he has for his readers’ intelligence with this risible nonsense:

 VAERS is designed to allow anyone to report an event, meaning the data is unverified… [Forbes]

But, in case you’re as dopey as the people who read Forbes evidently are, the fact that anyone can submit a report obviously doesn’t mean that they’re being entered into the database without any verification.

The Washington Post’s Aaron Blake showed a little less disdain for his audience by at least taking the trouble to provide a bogus source for his claim that the “data in the VAERS system is unverified.” He linked to another attempt to squash discussion from his fellow charlatans at PolitiFact which, though it does indeed assert that VAERS reports “are not verified before they’re entered into the database,” gives no indication where they’re getting the idea from.

The regime’s vast army of internet trolls would be having a field day if PolitiFact’s unverified claim were true. The CDC’s “frontline system for monitoring vaccine safety” — apart from massively undercounting potential side effects due to a lack of awareness of VAERS among medical personnel (See part 1) — would also be stuffed with reports of people dying of unrelated causes.

You know, like the COVID-19 fatality count.

We’ve known from the beginning that the virus’s official death toll deliberately conflates dying with Covid and dying from Covid. In fact, a number of factors guarantee an unknown but enormous number of bogus entries in the official death toll. The media is suggesting without evidence that the same holds for the post-Covid vaccine fatality reports flooding VAERS, thus proving the old adage that “there are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.”

An AP effort to nip any public discussion in the bud contained this flagrantly deceptive remark by Dr. Sean O’Leary, “vice-chair of the committee on infectious diseases for the American Academy of Pediatrics and professor of pediatrics at the University of Colorado”:

For example, if you get a vaccine and then you get struck by lightning, you can report that to VAERS. [AP]

Indeed, you can. But Dr. O’Leary’s implied suggestion that not only are such reports routinely entered, but that the reports of post-COVID-jab fatalities include so many they can safely be ignored, is such a low-down piece of deception that he ought to be stripped of his medical license.

The regime media use this damning claim not to discredit the CDC, whose word they nonetheless insist we take as gospel, but to malign and bully those who assume that a publicly accessible database isn’t going to be full of garbage data.

If the CDC really isn’t lifting a finger to weed out pranksters and saboteurs, then they’ve got to be deliberately fomenting the supposed irrational “anti-vaccine” sentiment we’re supposed to think is so dangerous.

But, on at least this occasion, the agency appears to be innocent of anything sleazy since they explicitly advise anyone submitting a report that:

You will be contacted by VAERS if follow-up information (i.e., medical records or other medical documentation) is needed. [Dept. of Health and Human Services]

That sentence would clearly seem to indicate that there’s some kind of verification.

But it’s also the 11th response on a page listing 17 questions, each of which has to be clicked to view its answer. And the question itself doesn’t mention verification.

Moreover, after spending a couple hours trying to find out about verification, that one not-easy-to-find nor terribly informative sentence is the only thing that turned up.

So it appears that those in charge at the CDC must be so irredeemably corrupt as to actually want a reporting system in place that barely counts a fraction of potential vaccine side effects. It also looks like they’re not too keen on anyone knowing what happens to VAERS reports between submission and publication. Nor does the CDC appear to provide any information on the related question of lag time, leading most people to assume that what they’re seeing at any given time represents all there currently is.

But you know what they say about assuming.

How many additional reports haven’t been logged in?

There are a lot of reasons to think that side effects are at least so far wildly underreported.

For example, there are as many reports of life-threatening illnesses as there are deaths.

In fact, the COVID-19 vaccines have caused an unprecedented number of reports of any kind.

And, as Alex Berenson noted, it’s likely that any system that’s suddenly showing more reports in a single week than it used to record in an entire year is being overwhelmed enough to have a sizeable backlog.

Berenson also reported on one woman who submitted a VAERS report in January but only received a request for more information in late April. In the interim, a jaw-dropping quarter million reports were added, suggesting that the backlog might be enormous.

But there are also other reasons to think that the CDC must be in possession of an extraordinarily large volume of reports that they’re not telling us about.

Here’s a screenshot from May 12 of the number of COVID-vaccine reports recorded in VAERS, sorted by month of vaccination.

Here’s the same data request on May 28.

As you can see, over 16 days in May, the reports continued to climb for people vaccinated in every month since December. Here’s that May-increase for each vaccination month.

As of May 28, 88% of adverse symptoms reported after Covid vaccination occurred within 15 days and 91% within 30. So, unless a lot of people are waiting several months to file a report, the CDC must have a significant backlog of reports that are getting entered months after they were received.

But also notice that on May 12, the most adverse events were reported for people who’d been vaccinated in January. Adverse event reports then steadily declined for those jabbed in February through April.

And though the May 28 data also shows the most reports for January vaccinations, the reports that were added make the decline less significant and interrupt it, creating second peak for those vaccinated in March.

That makes perfect sense if there’s a backlog getting retroactively filled in since, as you can see below, the total number of doses administered peaked in April and the number of first doses in March.

Absent a backlog, that would mean adverse events were dropping off considerably even as the number of people getting jabbed kept increasing.

Again, not impossible. But a substantial backlog perfectly explains both the early peak in adverse event reports relative to doses administered in the May 12 VAERS data, and why that peak became less pronounced when more adverse events were entered into the system, making the May 28 data better align with the dosage charts.

The upshot of all of this is that, though the CDC is allowing everyone to think that the VAERS data is up-to-date without actually saying so, there’s a lot of interconnecting evidence that a lot more reports must have come in than those we’re currently being allowed to see.

All of this would be bad enough by itself. But when placed in the larger context of the other deliberate deceptions about COVID-19, it becomes orders of magnitude worse.

When you step back to look at the whole picture, the obfuscation and contempt for evidence surrounding VAERS fits into the same pattern of deliberate deception that has been the norm since Covid first emerged a year and a half ago.

CLICK HERE FOR PART ONE…

CLICK HERE FOR PART THREE…

Michael Thau is a columnist at RedState. He has a PhD in philosophy from Princeton and has been writing extensively on COVID-19 since this nightmare began.

Support Revolver By Going AD-FREE

CHECK OUT THE NEWS FEED — FOLLOW US ON GAB — CHECK OUT THE MERCH STORE

SUPPORT REVOLVER.NEWS WITH A DONATION

Please contribute to our war chest. Donations help us grow, stay online, and fight.

“Our people have all left Drudge ... They like REVOLVER and others!”
President Donald J. Trump
“...many of Drudge's long-time readers have fled to Revolver News...”
Tucker Carlson, FOX News

Want to remove the ads on Revolver? Subscribe!

Support our war chest with a monthly subscription and enjoy a faster, minimal Revolver.News reading experience.

Subscribe monthly

$5.00 / monthHide ads for $5/month

Subscribe for a year

$49.00 / yearHide ads for $49/year

$11 OFF — Best value
Subscribe
Notify of
57 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Guest
4 months ago

5 W reporting. Thank you. My big why question is why the push to inoculate all the population for a disease which seems to have a mortality rate high in a specific demographic…65+ with exceptions for some co morbidities like obesity, high BP or diseases, cancer treatment etc?
Should not those people who are in those groups be the target of the vaccine effort or those people who have to work with susceptible people? If this disease were as impactful as polio or smallpox I would be more accepting of this vast vaccine effort. But the disease is not. I am not.
I really don't think there is any conspiracy with regard to this vaccine. I do think that many organizations that I had naively believed were impervious to politics are not so.
The recent article linked to by Revolver on Leninism…which can be boiled down to the party is always right, dissent cannot be tolerated and whatever it takes to destroy dissent is condoned/expected.
The left has embraced leninism, knowingly or not, this vaccine effort appears to be yet another symptom.

Guest
4 months ago

Yes. Likewise why the push to vaccinate people who've already been infected given that the vaccine can't provide any more immunity than the virus itself. Be sure to read the final installment as that and related questions are discussed there.
Thanks for comment– the Author

Guest
4 months ago

Interesting that when I saw this reply both the comment and the reply had the exact same number of thumbs up and down.

Greg C
4 months ago

Noticed that too. Somebody sits at home bored all day and just gets a 'tee-hee-hee' by intentionally downvoting.

Guest
4 months ago

NaziChop talking about himself again? It's his favorite subject, except for when he waxes lyrical about Adolf Hitler.

Guest
4 months ago

Who the heck is 5 W? 5 widgets? 5 wicked men? 5 waistbands expanding? 5 wet nurses? 5 Whiny NaziChops?

Guest
4 months ago

Sunny Today was complementing the writer. In the ancient days 5W was taught in every high school and journalism class. 5W was the standard used back in the days when the news was expected to educate instead of propagandize. It stands for Who, What, Where, Why, and When. Every good article had to contain the 5Ws.

Guest
4 months ago

According to the VAERS website, "reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable."

If that's the case where can we find vaccine injury and death information which IS complete, accurate, not coincidental and verifiable?

Why should we receive vaccines if no such information exists?

How can we make an informed risk/benefit analysis without it?

Guest
4 months ago

Same number of thumbs down as other comments. Hmmmm.

Guest
4 months ago

Not worth posting here because of all the thumbs down. Why don't they get rid of thumbs down, like they have on other smarter boards than this one? But I guess some daffy people would consider that "censorship" instead of good common sense. 😁😆😂😄😉

Guest
4 months ago

Some censorship is required, otherwise a board will be a total mess, with just trolls posting here, like Chop Liver and his multiple fake IDs.

Guest
4 months ago

What happened to your usual pejorative?

Guest
4 months ago

The word is out now in conservative circles to avoid this board. And not just because of NaziChop and his fifty fake IDs. That's its own form of "censorship" right back at the lazy fools that use the Israeli run Openweb boards instead of a board designed by Americans.

Guest
4 months ago

There it is!

Guest
4 months ago

It's not just that, Josee. There is a technical reason hardly anybody even sees this board, much less responds to anything on it. It's because it is seen as a pop-up, and many people who are using blocking software or a VPN don't even see this board load at all. So it is really a waste of time if you truly want to get your point of view across to a lot of people, because they just don't see it. Even older browsers like IE totally block it. Not worth it at all. Chopped Liver can talk to his multiple identities all he wants but when only a handful of people see this board in 24 hours he's really typing in a deep dark cave, all alone.

Guest
4 months ago

Ah, now I know the real reason Jilli cleared out. It's a waste of time here because hardly anyone sees this board even if they happen to click on the "exclusives". Bye for good! I'll stick to our new board which isn't a pop-up and can be seen easily by everyone.

Guest
4 months ago

Even if it does manage to load it can take several minutes. Most people won't stick around. Not even most of the time our usually abundantly patient church ladies. 😉

Guest
4 months ago

By "church ladies" you really mean jew Pig Zionist israeli Nazi Trolls.

Guest
4 months ago

Stop pretending to be multiple people, you are a loser and a FREAK Jilli.

Guest
4 months ago

Stop lying about beautiful Godly women strong in their faith. You are the only liar on this terrible board that hardly anyone can see (good thing, too, they can miss your venom). Bye bye demon.

Guest
4 months ago

You are a lying Racist Zionist jew Nazi TROLL.

Guest
4 months ago

I had a terrible experience with Firefox here. It was the first browser I tried and it would not let me post here. The box where you are supposed to type your screen name would not let me enter anything. The field was dead. But when I chose Chrome I didn't have that problem. I wonder if Openweb knows that millions of people using Firefox can't reply on their forums? It's probably yet another reason this board is dead, all the browsers that won't let you post, even if they do manage to see the pop-up style of their board.

Guest
4 months ago

Yeah I tried two browsers before one would let me post (Edge). The first two had the pinwheels turning and turning but never opening a field for a screen name. It's obvious Openweb didn't have the greatest software programmers in the development stage.

Guest
4 months ago

Firefox is owned and operated by anti-Christian, racist anti-White left wing extremists you MORON.

Guest
4 months ago

So? What's your beef NaziChop? She tried it and got rid of it. That was WISE. YOU hate Jews but are constantly on a web board they created. Why don't you stop being a hypocrite and leave such a board?

Guest
4 months ago

No answer from the hellbound hypocrite.

Guest
4 months ago

Only mentally retarded people use Firefox. Mozilla is a radical left-wing extremist company that is blatantly anti-Christian and anti-White.

Guest
4 months ago

It's particularly bad on cell phones, which most people are on today. Not so bad on desktops or laptops.

Guest
4 months ago

So who decides what is right and wrong. From what I've seen the 98% owned media by the 6 Khazarian Mafia families has no place to comment on their articles.

Guest
4 months ago

Jesus.

Jilli
4 months ago

The fact that he could even stupidly ask that question shows us once again what a profoundly lost soul and bitter soul he is. I've actually prayed for this Satanist in the past, but apparently even God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit have totally given up on him. Sad. Be that as it may, those who love Jesus will prevail in the end. God bless! 🙂

Guest
4 months ago

Say hello to fake and gay phony jewish space jesus when you see him on the rapture UFO!

Guest
4 months ago

The down votes are spam and paid trolls and if revolver would read their emails they would learn how to fix this problem.. They obviously need tech help..

Guest
4 months ago

Make friends instead of enemies and they'll thumb you up. It should not take a rocket scientist to figure that out.

Guest
4 months ago

He's no rocket scientist. His only friends are imaginary.

Guest
4 months ago

Lying Leftists Trying to destroy America from within are not friends – Not to anyone who loves their Country

Guest
4 months ago

Thumbs down are from the sheepletards who are mainly asleep to reality. Lets do an experiment: Israel, the British Crown and EU Elite and US Military did 9/11. We will see the response below. We will also say George Floyd was nothing but a L.A.R.P. Psyops made to have the Blacks all react in a specific behavior. Both are True statements but we will watch below the sheepletards reactions.

Guest
4 months ago

See? Incapable of learning any moral lessons. Lost soul.

Guest
4 months ago

It was Thumbs down that woke me up and dumped me out of the matrix. I saw a post on Yahoo news that use to have thumbs up and thumbs down and a guy stated 9/11 was an inside job.. go look at Building 7 9/11 BBC. There were 9 thumbs down and 2 thumbs up and sat there and I ask myself.. Now why would there be 2 thumbs up on such a ridiculous statement. So I went to youtube and put 9/11 Building 7 BBC in the search and I saw before my eyes a reporter from the BBC Stating that they received word that Building 7 Just fell down and behind here was a live shot of Building 7 standing. It later fell down like a demolition and I saw that video too…that WAS a Demolition. After Seeing that.. I woke up to all the Evil. Such a high level of evil that the masses do not see. Thanks to 9 thumbs down I am awake to seeing the same tribe(s) of people murder millions a millions generation after generation and the masses do not have a clue

Guest
4 months ago

Jew Pig Nazi israeli Troll.

Guest
4 months ago

Censorship is left wing. Free speech is triumphed by the right.

Guest
4 months ago

Yesterday I was in a "medical meeting" and had several hours of lectures and powerpoints on "how to entice your patients and their children to get the covid vaccine"
Along with messages that will be going out to patients in the network via phone, email, text. Most of these messages were produced by kids that say in part, "I lost my mommy to covid, you don't want to lose your family member, please go get the covid vaccine" set to sad mood music with the kids crying afterwards…

Even with all of Fauci's emails coming out yesterday all docs were placed 6 feet apart masks required for this meeting-even though over 90% of them have been vaccinated. Of course at lunch, while drinking or standing they could be less than 6 feet, laughing, coughing, talking without a mask.

The lies/debauchery/fakery are too much most days; yesterday in particular. I'm glad I can come home and detoxify with a good dose of truth.

Guest
4 months ago

There is something sinister at play here.

Guest
4 months ago

Yup! Just like the Lies the Left tells about Election Fraud! Pure EVIL walks the Earth these days

Guest
4 months ago

Yes, indeed. And his name is NaziChop.

Jilli
4 months ago

Hahaha! 🙂 Perfect. Love how he accuses innocent people of what he himself has been guilty of from the beginning. Go back several months on these practically invisible boards and you'll see absolutely nobody but him posting, before we church ladies showed up. He didn't even bother thumbing anyone up or down because all the posters were HIM. LOLOL! I've been on the internet since the late 1980's, and I have never seen a more disturbed, evil Satanist in my life. No wonder he loves Adolf Hitler and emulates him, his long dead, in the fiery pit for eternity, demon idol. Tsk tsk tsk. Toodles now, NaziChop. Enjoy talking to yourself and all your fake IDs, for no one else will anymore.

Guest
4 months ago

He's just jealous because you are a beautiful woman of God, make a lot of money in real estate, play the piano beautifully, raised five beautiful children you homeschooled, have the love of your devoted husband, while he no doubt sits alone with a red, angry face, typing away to himself in a lonely room somewhere, lacking any love in his life. Obviously no wife or he wouldn't be on the computer all the time like he is. Really truly a sad wicked person. He will be judged by God very severely for all his lies and attacks against people of God.

Guest
4 months ago

Great article by Michael Thau. Thanks for compiling all that data with an excellent conclusion.
I believe the people who did go to the trouble of reporting DID see a connection between the vax and the adverse reaction.

Guest
4 months ago

i think this vax has Bill Gates depopulation agenda written all over it.

Guest
4 months ago

I would like to summarize this report – Leftists/Progressives/Socilists/Communists are Pure EVIL!

That is all….

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies.

Okay