1. After getting literally everything they want in this 4,155-page monstrosity, the Democrats won’t give us an up-or-down vote on an amendment to preserve Title 42. Why? Because it will pass, and that terrifies them because they want chaos on the border.
2. The omnibus contains nothing to secure the border, and in fact contains language undermining border security. Without an up-or-down vote on Title 42, every Senate Republican should oppose cloture on this bill.
3. With a 4,155-page omnibus spending bill that advances Democratic priorities and spends too much money, Republicans should remember that they don’t have to support this beast.
4. Senate Republicans should instead support a short-term spending bill, allowing the new Congress—with the incoming Republican House—to start the spending process over again in January.
5. In the meantime, all Senate Republicans should be ready and willing to return to the Capitol to support Title 42, even on short notice.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Any senator who claims to care about border security should NOT vote for the omnibus—especially in the absence of language preserving Title 42. There are those in both parties who want to have it both ways. Don’t let them.
2. If you care about border security, it would be better to pass a short-term spending bill now, and then allow the new Congress to tackle this problem in early 2023, with the benefit of a balanced Congress—with a Democratic Senate and a Republican House of Representatives.
3. If you care about our debt and deficit, it would be better to pass a short-term spending bill now and then allow the new Congress to tackle this problem in early 2023, with the benefit of a balanced Congress—with a Democratic Senate and a Republican House of Representatives.
I was wrong. The omnibus spending bill, which was finally released less than 48 hours before it’s expected to pass, isn’t 3,000 pages long. It’s 4,155 pages long. appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
This is an act of legislative barbarism.
I don’t yet know how many slimy handouts are in this bill. But here’s a good example of why u hate these things: the bill contains a $200,000 earmark for the Rhode Island AFL-CIO for a “climate Jobs workforce training initiative”at the request of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse.
1.@SecDef, watch @LelandVittert’s interview with @BrittanyAlkonis. You’ll see that you’ve received bad advice, and that you should (1) grant Alkonis’s Exception to Policy, (2) restore his promotion, pay, and pre-confinement leave, and (3) scramble to secure his immediate return.
2. I stand ready, willing, and eager to applaud you when you do so. You’re a good man, and I know you don’t want to treat Lt. Alkonis this way.
3. If you stay the course and leave the Alkonis family hanging days before Christmas, I think you’ll find the American people rather less than sympathetic to your decision, and that’s putting it really mildly. They’ll be outraged, and I will make sure of it.
Ask your U.S. senators and and representatives today: is it ever a good idea to vote for a 3,000-page bill spending nearly $2 TRILLION that, just three days before the bill is expected to pass, only about four members of Congress have actually seen?
You might also ask them what the risks of passing such a bill might be, especially if it contains more than 7,500 handouts earmarked for special interests that can pay for expensive lobbyists.
It’s not just that members of Congress haven’t seen it; neither have the American people or even the press!
1/4 .@robertcobrien is right: if DoD is either unable or unwilling to get the job done, @potus should transfer the case forthwith to the Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage affairs (@StateSPEHA), Ambassador Roger Carstens.
2/4 To qualify per se for action by @StateSPEHA, Alkonis would need to be deemed wrongfully detained under 22 USC 1741. Though he doesn’t qualify per se under that strict legal definition, @potus could—and should—direct @StateSPEHA to lead the effort to #BringRidgeHome.
3/4 After working on this for 18 months, I have received this input from multiple, reliable sources with inside knowledge: DoD is actively discouraging any aggressive action by State or the WH to get Japan to release Alkonis. That interference must end NOW. Put @StateSPEHA on it!
.@SecDef, please don’t stop paying Lt. Ridge Alkonis. You shouldn’t be hanging him and his family out to dry ten days from now.
You need to stand up for him. If you turn your back on him, you’ll be sending a devastating message not only to the Alkonis family, but also to all U.S. soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines.
You have the authority to grant his exception to policy under 37 U.S.C. 503. There is not a plausible reading of that statute that would suggest otherwise.